Date: 28th December 1983
Waterway: North Oxford Canal
Catch: 66 fish for 2-8-0
Species:
50 Roach to 0-1-8
14 Gudgeon to 0-1-8
2 tiny Perch
There's sad, anal & obsessive...take your pick |
A distinct feeling of excitement grew as I approached the stretch I had not even seen, let alone fished, for so long
The mind plays tricks over such a long period though but one thing was certain, the canal had become considerably wider since 1983 as the far bank had deteriorated such that the possibility of a rather shallow length of cut was likely to be discovered once the plummet had done it's job; like the chalk on a snooker cue, fundamentally important at first but then put to one side. Not so however, as a seriously steady depth bank-to-bank was discovered and provided something of a pleasant surprise on the first day I had been back this autumn without half-term boat traffic to contend with, and confidence was suitably boosted
The prey of course would be big roach; in 1983 it was tiddlers or, as we called them then, 'bits' at around 25 to the pound. Worth noting however that the gudgeon were huge and if you could get onto a nest of them in a match in the '80's they were well worth targetting when 2 or 3 pounds would be a framing weight
Yep, bits! |
The float would be a cane-stemmed pole float; in 1983 it was a grey pole float very much like a scaled-down traditional avon made by a canal angling maestro and, in my humble opinion, the greatest canal angler of all time, Billy Makin
2012 - a 2 hour session. 1983 - five hours.
Viewed from the other side, The same wide-span brick-arch bridge nearly three decades on |
The fish initially allowed itself to be drawn to the right away from the feed but then tore back through it, scattering any hope of another fish for the foreseeable future. Not all that soon, but after a relatively spirited battle, a clonking canal roach was drawn over the part-submerged net. 7 hours this fish had taken and it was certainly a pounder
After another spell of anticipated inactivity listening to the bird life - chuckling fieldfares, chinking chaffinches, bullfinches calling their brief recorder-like note and rooks in the distance - it was time to risk another helping of crumb feed. I say 'risk' because it had been noticed previously that feeding again after the initial introduction would kill the swim stone dead but a certain feeling prevailed, a feeling that those fish which may have been caused to hang-off the feed by the frantic attempt to escape by the first roach could be brought back onto the feed by tempting them with another helping
Persistent rain and grey skies helped to keep the roach feeding well after dawn I am sure |
The next put-in also produced an instant bite and a solid fish was felt and played for a few seconds before it managed to slip the hook. Difficult to tell whether it was bigger than the first when we are only talking ounces of difference but it was a good 'un for sure
A carefully organised weigh-in in the rain at the end of a two-hour session revealed the bigger roach to be a cracking 1-3-6 and it's smaller friend 0-14-2
Silver Jewels adorned with Rubies
A quick check of the all-time canal list indicated that this one slotted in at third behind fish of 1-3-12 in 1993 and 1-4-12 in May this year. Another trek into the distance, dimensionally and in terms of time, would soon follow I was sure
No dogs seen today but a few heard. Sadly although I can tell a few birds by song I am not quite up to scratch with dog woofs so we'll have to stick with the feathered interest:
Long-tailed tit, blue tit, blackbird, fieldfare, rook, carrion crow, mute swan, greylag goose, woodpigeon, stock dove, bullfinch, chaffinch, high-level gulls (that's not say gulls in charge but high-flying ones)
A brilliant couple of redfins there George, well done.
ReplyDeleteOh, thanks Mark, all the more reason for a concerted effort through the winter now I think
DeleteLove it, love it, love it!
ReplyDeleteGreat blog.
Steady on Russell...but thank you anyway! I've just discovered your blog and very much enjoying that too. Good comparisons from a very different per of the world for sure
DeleteRussell, Not sure if this will work but it's the only thing I can think of. I don't seem to be able to view your blog any more. Have I been sacked (or is technology getting the better of me)?!
DeleteCheers