Opting for the pole on a small river or stream with the
usual prevalence of snags and other potential banana skins may seem foolhardy on the
face of it.
The seasoned angler who may have fished with a pole back in
the days when we referred to them as Roach Poles and flirted with thin white
elastic, tiny floats, light lines and miniscule hooks would certainly find the
idea questionable with memories of yards and yards of uncontrollable light
elastic coming into play when a big fish took the bait under extreme, or any,
conditions. I distinctly recall The Old Duffer hooking tench and carp in a
side-arm off the River Nene some decades ago when the main river was a raging
chocolate torrent. All the fish knew where to shelter of course, and so did he.
Fibreglass pole in hand, aluminium crook and 6 or 9 inches of dangling elastic
made very hard work of landing anything over a pound!
Today the pole fishing world is much changed. While the
weight of poles is not much different the stiffness and power is hugely
improved and the prospect of using elastics that could tow a small car is only
too real.
Against that intro then the pole on snaggy streams is not so
daft an idea but, that said, I would not suggest it is any substitute for an
Avon rod in tight situations with snags all-round but when there is space to
wield the thing, and slacks and creases to take advantage of, then it offers
more than float fishing and ledgering in the conventional sense during the
colder months.
It is often the case that rivers fluctuate in depth, colour
and flow for the majority of the January – early March period and this is the
time when the method is at its most useful, although it does have its uses for
a few fish in clear deep water too when perhaps all else would fail during
daylight.
The biggest issue with fishing the ‘tip on streams is the
finicky bites of smaller fish. It is not, these days, in my own modus operandi to pursue small fish
anyway but it has become quite clear the vast majority of roach to this method
are over 3 ounces, and often over 6 ounces, but of course it is more the effect
of the winter state of river causing this; a time when ‘bits’ are less
susceptible to an anglers bait for whatever reason.
The benefit of the pole is that innate feel for what is
going on under the surface and associated instant contact with the fish.
4lbs 4 ounces of roach at a good stamp on an otherwise difficult day |
Over the past three seasons I have been slowly working on this
method each winter when circumstances allowed and eventually coming to terms with the issues and finding
solutions. Some of these came from the internet, via websites and YouTube,
others were worked out on the hoof, but the way I use it now is good enough to
produce a few fish, and very regularly good fish, when all else available is a
touch too hit and miss to be reliable.
So how does it work?
I am not big in technical stuff these days as it can very quickly get boring and so I will keep that to the point but, as I alluded to in the previous post, there is one particularly ingenious little dodge that cannot go unmentioned...
The biggest issue as with ledgering for roach is the fish feeling the rod tip and smelling a water rat. The answer is to use a separate short length of fine pole elastic, the old no2 (red) or 3 (green) will usually suit, at the top of the main line of the rig and attached parallel to it in a manner that enables the tension of the line alongside it to be adjusted, for this fairly stiff pole float rubbers about 10-15mm long plugged with an off-cut of pole float bristle do the trick. It is however far easier to look at a diagram!
The idea being that the line between pole tip and feeder is held tight so that the little slack in the mainline enables the fish to pull against the light elastic for 3 or 4 inches (75-100mm) before it meets the more solid resistance of tightened main line and pole tip/main elastic.
The other unusual part of the rig is that it does not require float, to do so would not work as the rest of the line needs to be held tight, as in normal ledgering. All one needs therefore is a simple marker and so chunky pole float bristle, fixed double-rubber, held so that the majority of it is above the water does the job...although I am about to make a further experiment here which I will report back on as, currently, this is the weakest part of the system.
The feeder end of the set-up is fairly standard. A 20g upwards cage feeder (to suit the flow) will do although proprietary ones with the weight in the base are best as this leaves the line above it in more direct contact with the business end.
The feeder is attached, via a beaded clip, on a 4" (100mm) loop to a 1 to 3 foot (300-900mm) hook-length, which in my experience usually ends up at around 18" (450mm) long, and with shot about 5" (125mm) from the hook varying from no8 to no4 again dictated by the flow and (lack or scarcity of) bites.
Finally to the main pole elastic. This does need to be heavy elastic as one needs to subdue those occasional chub. 16 seems to be ideal. This may sound heavy-handed but with the flow, the feeder and the fish a good foot will often show and, as long as those roach are handled gently to the net, there will be no concern at all about preconceived over-gunning.
Technicalities out of the way then, the actual fishing is very simple...this is the bit that no one else explains!
Somewhat obviously the depth is plumbed with the feeder (best done before adding the hook-length) and the marker bristle ideally wants to be set around 6" (150mm) over-depth.
Personally the preferred bait (be shocked!) is bread. Coarsely liquidised in the feeder and a pinch of flake in varying sizes on the 14 or 16 spade end (for lightness) hook but, again seeking those bigger stamp fish, never smaller than a five pence piece (That said, Iobworms in low feed-content ground bait or molehill is also a good bet when the water is heavily turbid, using sections or indeed whole lob's on a 10 or 8 hook).
Let's assume, for starters, that the depth and flow suit fishing to hand, with the line, say, a foot or so shorter than the pole. The feeder is swung-out downstream and allowed to gently 'plop' through the surface about a metre below the spot where you intend to hold the float, and of course, on small streams, the background can vary massively so being able to see the marker is key in the decision.
The pole is then held tight to the feeder as it sinks against the pole in an upstream direction with the marker above the surface until it is felt to hit the bottom...and if you aren't sure whether this has occurred the feeder is too light and is being held-up by the flow...the marker can then be lowered (still on a tight line) upstream and down toward the surface until it is just touching the water, and held there. This action makes sure that the line is not vertical to the feeder which gives a more direct line from fish to marker without it feeling the feed so much and also gives a degree of latitude in holding the pole whereas a vertical marker is also very difficult to hold in place.
Bites are often very positive in fish above six ounces and sometimes will straighten the slack line parallel with the extra elastic feature such that the bite is felt on the pole before you can even react. Chub regularly do this. More tentative bites however are often magnified by just allowing the marker to hang a fraction more freely at the onset of a bite, thus allowing the fish less resistance once you realise it is interested.
The strike can be straight through the line of marker to feeder and then the fish will be drawn upstream, gauging its size as you go. If it is a bigger fish, perhaps a chub, then do not hesitate to put a significant bend in the pole to keep it out of snags. The heavy elastic is incredible at not only controlling the fish but somehow the lack of a solid resistance, such as it might feel with a rod, makes the fish less likely to 'try anything silly'. This may sound odd, and until it is experienced it is hard to believe, but it is undoubtedly true that fish fight harder on a powerful rod than on an elasticated pole. I am certain they feel more 'concern' the more direct the contact, which is logical.
The second critical point when playing a fish is the need to play it out completely before bringing it too close to the bank to net it. The main failing of the pole is that, subject to the sudden last minute lunging of the fish to get under the near bank, there will be insufficient control.
I have tended to find that bites will come within the first three 'drops' (they can barely be described as casts!) and, again odd though it may sound, I am happy to rove with minimal kit until I find creases and slacks that have the target fish in them. Once the fish are found sport can be very entertaining and with the fish often inclined to move around slacks under flood conditions it is often necessary to keep moving the feeder position to keep the bites coming after the initial burst of bites.
Again in my experience, a bite seems to come a certain time after the rig has been settled into the right position and I always believe, though have no actual proof other than the ever-expanding gut, that this is the time it takes for the bread to become waterlogged and soft.
----
Okay. All clear so far?
Personally the preferred bait (be shocked!) is bread. Coarsely liquidised in the feeder and a pinch of flake in varying sizes on the 14 or 16 spade end (for lightness) hook but, again seeking those bigger stamp fish, never smaller than a five pence piece (That said, Iobworms in low feed-content ground bait or molehill is also a good bet when the water is heavily turbid, using sections or indeed whole lob's on a 10 or 8 hook).
Let's assume, for starters, that the depth and flow suit fishing to hand, with the line, say, a foot or so shorter than the pole. The feeder is swung-out downstream and allowed to gently 'plop' through the surface about a metre below the spot where you intend to hold the float, and of course, on small streams, the background can vary massively so being able to see the marker is key in the decision.
The pole is then held tight to the feeder as it sinks against the pole in an upstream direction with the marker above the surface until it is felt to hit the bottom...and if you aren't sure whether this has occurred the feeder is too light and is being held-up by the flow...the marker can then be lowered (still on a tight line) upstream and down toward the surface until it is just touching the water, and held there. This action makes sure that the line is not vertical to the feeder which gives a more direct line from fish to marker without it feeling the feed so much and also gives a degree of latitude in holding the pole whereas a vertical marker is also very difficult to hold in place.
Bites are often very positive in fish above six ounces and sometimes will straighten the slack line parallel with the extra elastic feature such that the bite is felt on the pole before you can even react. Chub regularly do this. More tentative bites however are often magnified by just allowing the marker to hang a fraction more freely at the onset of a bite, thus allowing the fish less resistance once you realise it is interested.
3lbs plus chub on pole feeder |
The second critical point when playing a fish is the need to play it out completely before bringing it too close to the bank to net it. The main failing of the pole is that, subject to the sudden last minute lunging of the fish to get under the near bank, there will be insufficient control.
Biggest chub on the method to date at three pounds, seven ounces |
Again in my experience, a bite seems to come a certain time after the rig has been settled into the right position and I always believe, though have no actual proof other than the ever-expanding gut, that this is the time it takes for the bread to become waterlogged and soft.
----
Okay. All clear so far?
To the final, trickiest, but again very inventive part of the method (I can say that as I didn't come-up with the idea!). Most pole anglers will be aware of the difficulty in shipping-out a pole with bread on the hook and not losing it on the way out, or, in other situations, snagging the rig and any bait in nearside vegetation.
The above assumed fishing 'to hand' but if you need to add and remove joints to perform the task how do you keep the feeder and bait out of the water until the time is right?
The answer is, as often with these things, very simple and yet a perfect solution.
Cable ties!
Simply wrap a cable tie around the pole a few inches short of the distance between pole tip and feeder; cut the tail off leaving about 3/4" (20mm) projecting up on the side of the pole where your spare hand is (in most cases to the right) and simply hang the line off this as you ship-out. When you get to the correct length twist the pole with tip held high until the line falls off and lay the feeder in the water once you have requisite control of the swinging weight. These are the sort of tricks, I could never fathom as my wind doesn't work in that way, very impressive thinking indeed, and it's easy to carry a few cable ties of varying length as they weight nothing. One word of warning however - it is no challenge to crush a modern pole so please do not be tempted to over-tighten they only need to grip and this can be achieved by attaching them loosely and sliding them along.
So that is about it. The feed levels and therefore sometimes feeder size will vary from river to river but experimentation on the day will soon sort this out.
Good luck, only about three weeks to go now but, with rivers continually above normal level currently, it is a method well worth the effort of adding to the repertoire in my humble view.
----
BIG WINTER CANAL ROACH CHALLENGE 2016/17
I am told the phrase 'red letter day' refers back to the old tradition, still practiced, of using red ink for special days on calendars and the like.
In that case I have one thing to state here: 22nd February 2017
A date when this happened on the North Oxford canal in an area I had neglected since last winter...
The best single catch of big canal roach to date.
The glow still pervades I must confess, like a Ready Brek advert of old...but with a special diamond and rubies recipe.
----
!! A NEW BLOGGERS CHALLENGE 2017-18 !!
Myself and Russell (yes, he's back!), are intending to run a Bloggers Challenge very much along the lines of the 2015-16 model but with the added small species bleak, gudgeon and ruffe.
This time round it won't be necessary to be author of a blog so long as your fish are reported in photographic form on someone's blog (Martin!) before they are recorded on the spreadsheet.
I am seeking 'expressions of interest', as Land Agents would say, with a view to commencing at 00.01hrs on May 1st 2017, splitting the close season neatly in two. This should give us all plenty of time to seek-out suitably accurate small fish kitchen scales and for the spreadsheeet to be readied and all registered to access it.
'Can't wait!
Good luck, only about three weeks to go now but, with rivers continually above normal level currently, it is a method well worth the effort of adding to the repertoire in my humble view.
----
BIG WINTER CANAL ROACH CHALLENGE 2016/17
I am told the phrase 'red letter day' refers back to the old tradition, still practiced, of using red ink for special days on calendars and the like.
In that case I have one thing to state here: 22nd February 2017
A date when this happened on the North Oxford canal in an area I had neglected since last winter...
The best single catch of big canal roach to date.
The glow still pervades I must confess, like a Ready Brek advert of old...but with a special diamond and rubies recipe.
----
!! A NEW BLOGGERS CHALLENGE 2017-18 !!
Myself and Russell (yes, he's back!), are intending to run a Bloggers Challenge very much along the lines of the 2015-16 model but with the added small species bleak, gudgeon and ruffe.
This time round it won't be necessary to be author of a blog so long as your fish are reported in photographic form on someone's blog (Martin!) before they are recorded on the spreadsheet.
I am seeking 'expressions of interest', as Land Agents would say, with a view to commencing at 00.01hrs on May 1st 2017, splitting the close season neatly in two. This should give us all plenty of time to seek-out suitably accurate small fish kitchen scales and for the spreadsheeet to be readied and all registered to access it.
'Can't wait!
Good read George be good to see how you get on with the method. Incidentally count me in for the bloggers challenge as I enjoyed it last time. I assume split in to river, canal and lake like it was before with overall winner.
ReplyDeleteGreat to have you involved Mick and, yes, 3 venue types as before. Will update you as and when.
ReplyDeleteLovely bag of roach George. Nicely constructed article on the pole feeder too. Lots of interesting thought and detail.
ReplyDeleteI'll join the challenge. It fits in nicely with my plans for more variety
Thanks Sean. Not too boring I hope!
DeleteYou're in...and my thoughts precisely.